From 310dab26a7f565f724e95c23f2dbbcec6fa36de8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stonewall Jackson Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:12:50 -0400 Subject: reevaluating-rhel: typo --- src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md b/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md index 8874ade..51348fc 100644 --- a/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md +++ b/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ like this is the case for Stream. Am I wrong? RedHat [asserts](https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/centos-stream-is-continuous-delivery/) that "To the untrained eye, CentOS Stream is already as stable as RHEL." If that is really the case, -why did so many people jump to Rocky/Alma? Spite? (This is not sarcasm--I'm geniunely curious.) +why did so many people jump to Rocky/Alma? Spite? (This is not sarcasm--I'm genuinely curious.) CentOS Stream gets security updates through the RHEL "full support" phase (5.5 years). If Stream is truly "as good as RHEL, but only for 5 years," then I'd consider this a viable option. -- cgit