diff options
| author | Stonewall Jackson <stonewall@sacredheartsc.com> | 2023-06-25 20:12:50 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stonewall Jackson <stonewall@sacredheartsc.com> | 2023-06-25 20:12:50 -0400 |
| commit | 310dab26a7f565f724e95c23f2dbbcec6fa36de8 (patch) | |
| tree | dc9f3508d0960f1fae5f32448eef3832848fe768 | |
| parent | 3967364322a8af74d1fadcdc9004f22d12d26462 (diff) | |
| download | www-310dab26a7f565f724e95c23f2dbbcec6fa36de8.tar.gz www-310dab26a7f565f724e95c23f2dbbcec6fa36de8.zip | |
reevaluating-rhel: typo
| -rw-r--r-- | src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md b/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md index 8874ade..51348fc 100644 --- a/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md +++ b/src/blog/reevaluating-rhel/index.md @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ like this is the case for Stream. Am I wrong? RedHat [asserts](https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/centos-stream-is-continuous-delivery/) that "To the untrained eye, CentOS Stream is already as stable as RHEL." If that is really the case, -why did so many people jump to Rocky/Alma? Spite? (This is not sarcasm--I'm geniunely curious.) +why did so many people jump to Rocky/Alma? Spite? (This is not sarcasm--I'm genuinely curious.) CentOS Stream gets security updates through the RHEL "full support" phase (5.5 years). If Stream is truly "as good as RHEL, but only for 5 years," then I'd consider this a viable option. |